Grassroots in Nebraska

Working towards Constitutional, limited government

  • Home
  • About
    • About GiN
    • Principles
    • Operating Philosophy
    • Policies
  • Elections
    • Election 2016
    • Election 2014
    • Election 2012
    • Election 2010
    • Local Elections
    • Sample Ballots
  • Local
    • City of Lincoln
    • Lancaster County
  • State
    • Your Representatives
    • Governor
    • NE Unicameral
  • Federal
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
    • Tip Submissions
You are here: Home / Archives for Nebraska / State Sovereignty

NE Primary Election 2018: Blasts from the GiN Past re Sen. Deb Fischer

Originally published April 29, 2018, By Linda. Updated April 29, 2018. Leave a Comment

NE Primary Election 2018:  Blasts from the GiN Past re Sen. Deb Fischer

I spent a bit of time recently researching the various Republican primary candidates challenging Senator Deb Fischer for the U.S. Senate seat she currently occupies.  In the process, I couldn’t resist revisiting some vintage GiN.  And when I say that, I’m not talking about a dusty bottle of an adult beverage, but articles that were […]

Filed Under: 2018 Elections, Elections, Featured, Nebraska, Republican Party, State Sovereignty, US Senate Tagged With: 2018 Primary election, deb fischer, Featured, gin, government, Grassroots in Nebraska, nebraska legislature, nebraska unicameral, senator fischer, U.S. Senator Deb Fischer, u.s. senators nebraska

Ruling: State Lawsuit Against Illegal ObamaCare IRS Rule Can Proceed

Originally published September 12, 2013, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated July 21, 2015. 2 Comments

Ruling: State Lawsuit Against Illegal ObamaCare IRS Rule Can Proceed

On August 11, 2013, a federal judge ruled that the State of Oklahoma has standing to proceed with a lawsuit challenging an Internal Revenue Service rule issued in May 2012 regarding premium subsidies in the form of tax credits and penalties delivered through the Affordable Care Act’s insurance exchange provisions. Oklahoma’s Attorney General Scott Pruitt […]

Filed Under: Featured, Federal Legislation, Health Care, Legal Limit, State Sovereignty Tagged With: aca, attorney general, attorneys general, congress, defund, governor, governors, health care law, insurance exchanges, irs, jon bruning, jonathan adler, lawsuit, legislators, litigation, michael cannon, nfib v sebelius, obamacare, oklahoma, ppaca, state senators

LB512 and Common Core — A Potential Threat to Local Control of Schools

Originally published March 18, 2013, By Linda. Updated May 14, 2016. 3 Comments

LB512 and Common Core — A Potential Threat to Local Control of Schools

Just a quick post today to call your attention to a bill in the Unicameral that’s not attracting much attention, but should.  WHEN THE EDUCATION COMMITTEE HELD A HEARING CONCERNING THIS BILL ON FEBRUARY 25TH, NO ONE SPOKE IN OPPOSITION. LB512 was introduced by Senator Jim Scheer (Dist. 19), who’s a new face in the […]

Filed Under: Big Brother Government, Data Gathering, Education, Featured, Government Spending, Nebraska, Senators, State Legislation, State Sovereignty, Stimulus, Unicameral Tagged With: 10th Amendment, bill and melinda gates foundation, bribing state governments to accept federal control, common core curriculum, common core state standards, Education, k through 12 educational standards, language arts standards, local control of education, math standards, nebraska department of education, nebraska state board of education, race to the top program, standards for math, state sovereignty, state standards for education, stimulus funds, u.s. department of education grants

Pelosian Economics: Medicaid Expansion as Fiscal Stimulus

Originally published February 26, 2013, By Linda. Updated May 11, 2017. Leave a Comment

Pelosian Economics: Medicaid Expansion as Fiscal Stimulus

Supporters of LB577, the bill that would expand Medicaid in Nebraska, argue that expansion will result in an economic boom due to the infusion of approximately $3.5 billion in “free” federal tax dollars. Specifically, they predict at least $700 million annually in new economic activity, which could finance at least 10,000 new jobs annually, from […]

Filed Under: Budget, Charity vs Welfare, Founding Principles, Government Spending, Medicaid, Personal Responsibility, Progressivism, Senators, State Legislation, State Sovereignty, Stimulus, Taxes, Welfare Tagged With: arguments against expanding medicaid, arguments re expanding medicaid, carnac the magnificent, expanding medicaid, extending unemployment benefits, food stamps, food stamps as job creator, food stamps creates jobs, happy days are here again, keynesian stimulus, keynsian economics, lb 577, lb577, medicaid expansion, medicaid extension creates jobs, medicaid spending, Nancy Pelosi, ne medicaid, nebraska medicaid, opportunity cost, snap program, stimulus spending, unemployment, unemployment as job creator, unemployment benefits, unemployment benefits extension, unemployment creates jobs, unemployment insurance, welfare spending

The Myth of Nebraska’s Sovereignty Resolution (10th Amendment)

Originally published February 22, 2013, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated July 21, 2015. Leave a Comment

The Myth of Nebraska’s Sovereignty Resolution (10th Amendment)

It’s both incredibly ironic and highly appropriate for me to be writing this article at this time. As February 2010 neared its end, I was very tired, but excited about GiN’s ongoing effort in support of what most people would identify as the State Sovereignty or Tenth Amendment Resolution. That resolution, LR539 1 Note that […]

Filed Under: Bailouts, Budget, Featured, Government Spending, Governor, Nebraska, Republican Party, Senators, State Legislation, State Sovereignty, Stimulus, Tenth Amendment, Unicameral Tagged With: 2010, american recovery and reinvestment act, arra, dave heineman, federal encroachment, health care law, lr539, medicaid expansion, ne 10th amendment, nebraska, nebraska health care, nebraska sovereignty resolution, obamacare, ppaca, real id act of 2005, south dakota v dole, state legislature, state sovereignty, state sovereignty for sale, stimulus, Tenth Amendment, tony fulton, unfunded mandates, Unicameral

LB577: Nebraska’s Unaffordable Care Act

Originally published February 20, 2013, By Linda. Updated February 25, 2018. Leave a Comment

LB577: Nebraska’s Unaffordable Care Act

This article is part of a series.  Find the complete list published to date at the conclusion of this article. Governor Heineman has vocally opposed the expansion of Medicaid in Nebraska on the ground that it is unaffordable. At the risk of exposing the cynical side of my nature, it seems obvious to me that […]

Filed Under: Budget, Charity vs Welfare, Civil Society, Featured, Founding Principles, Government Spending, Governor, Health Care, Medicaid, Morality, Nebraska, Personal Responsibility, Progressivism, Senators, State Legislation, State Sovereignty, Taxes, Welfare Tagged With: bob krist, cost of expanding medicaid, cost of expanding medicaid ne, cost of medicaid expansion in nebraska, emergency room visits, expanding medicaid, expanding medicaid cost savings, expanding medicaid ne, expanding medicaid no cost savings, expanding medicaid will save money, expanding medicaid won't save money, expansion of medicaid nebraska, governor dave heineman, governor heineman, kathy campbell, medicaid, medicaid funding, medicaid patients and emergency room care, medicaid patients emergency care, medicaid recipients, medicaid spending, senator bob krist, senator kathy campbell, uninsured persons and emergency room care, wishful thinking

Money for Nothing and Health Care for Free

Originally published February 15, 2013, By Linda. Updated July 21, 2015. 2 Comments

Money for Nothing and Health Care for Free

Author’s Note: This is the seventh in a series of articles about Nebraska’s Medicaid program, the Unicameral’s apparent intent to expand it, and the many reasons why expansion is an uncommonly bad idea. Although they don’t have to be read in order, here are links to the previously-published articles in the series – see the […]

Filed Under: Budget, Budget, Character, Charity vs Welfare, Civil Society, Deficit, Featured, Federal, Founding Principles, Government Spending, Health Care, Medicaid, Nebraska, Personal Responsibility, Progressivism, Senators, State Legislation, State Sovereignty, Welfare Tagged With: aca medicaid, affordable care act medicaid, balance state budget, balanced state budget, Ben Nelson, cornhusker kickback, dire straits, economics of medicaid expansion, entitlement spending, entitlement spending nebraska, entitlements, expand medicaid, federal share of medicaid, federal share of medicaid spending, federal tax dollars are not found money, federal tax dollars are not free, federal tax dollars to pay for medicaid, found money, free health care, free healthcare, free money, government, government spending, Grassroots in Nebraska, Health Care, health care law, health care reform, healthcare, healthcare reform, henry hazlitt, lb 577, lb577, legislature, limited government, medicaid, medicaid expansion, money for nothing and chicks for free, money for nothing and health care for free, ne, ne medicaid, ne medicaid expansion, ne medicaid funding, ne medicaid spending, nebr, nebraska, nebraska budget, nebraska legislature, nebraska medicaid, nebraska medicaid benefits, nebraska medicaid funding, nebraska medicaid programs, nebraska medicaid reform, nebraska medicaid reform legislation, nebraska unicameral, no free lunch, no such thing as a free lunch, obamacare, politicians, senator ben nelson, senator bob krist, senator harry reid, source of funds nebraska, sources of funds federal government, state senator bob krist, state senator krist, state senators, state share of medicaid spending, Unicameral, voluntary medicaid expansion, welfare, welfare spending

People Don’t Walk Away From a Fool and His Money

Originally published January 28, 2013, By Linda. Updated February 25, 2018. Leave a Comment

People Don’t Walk Away From a Fool and His Money

Editor’s Note: This article is part of a series, see the bottom for a complete list. * * * * * * * * * * You’re probably familiar with the old adage “a fool and his money are soon parted.” Paul McCartney put a twist on this proverb in his lyrics for the song […]

Filed Under: Budget, Character, Charity vs Welfare, Civil Society, Congress, Featured, Federal, Founding Principles, Government Spending, Health Care, History, Morality, Nebraska, Personal Responsibility, Senators, Sovereignty, State Legislation, State Sovereignty, Unicameral, Welfare Tagged With: 1988 state of the union address, a fool and his money, aid to medicaid funding, appropriations committee chair heath mello, badfinger, battle for the future, bill clinton, charity, clinton welfare reform, come and get it, congress, conservative moral arguments, Constitution, creating dependency, dependency, dependency on government, distributive justice, entitled, entitlement mentality, executive power, expanding medicaid, extending unemployment benefits, extension of unemployment benefits, Featured, gaming the welfare system, gin, government, government dependency, government spending, Grassroots in Nebraska, Health Care, health care law, health care reform, healthcare, healthcare reform, heath mello, jean-baptiste michau, john stossel, legislature, limited government, long term unemployed, long-term unemployment, makers and takers, means-tested government benefits, medicaid, medicaid eligibility, medicaid expansion, medicaid expansion nebraska, medicaid funding, medicaid in trouble, moral arguments for conservatism, moral ground, moral hazard, moral values, morality, nation of takers, national values, ne, nebr, nebraska, nebraska budget, nebraska legislature, nebraska unicameral, negrassroots, obamacare, paul mccartney, politicians, president ronald reagan, progressivism, public assistance, Reagan's state of the union address, Reagan's state of the union speech, redistribution of wealth, ronald reagan, senator heath mello, sense of entitlement, sixth sense, social justice, social security, social security disability, social security disability insurance program, social welfare programs, social welfare state, state senators, state sovereignty, stossel, tom evans jr., unemployment benefits, unemployment compensation, unemployment insurance, Unicameral, unicameral appropriations committee, waiver of work requirements, welfare, welfare as disincentive to work, welfare fraud, welfare punishes work, welfare queen, work ethic

Legislative Irresponsibility: LB599, NE Budget & Health Care Law

Originally published April 10, 2012, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated July 21, 2015. Leave a Comment

Legislative Irresponsibility: LB599, NE Budget & Health Care Law

GiN’s letter to all NE Senators regarding LB599 – the effort to expand Medicaid benefits to illegal immigrants and others deemed ineligible by the Federal government.  Read full articleLegislative Irresponsibility: LB599, NE Budget & Health Care Law

Filed Under: Budget, Charity vs Welfare, Civil Society, Featured, Government Spending, Governor, Health Care, Immigration, Morality, Nebraska, Personal Responsibility, Senators, State Legislation, State Sovereignty, Stimulus, Tenth Amendment, Unicameral Tagged With: 102nd legislature nebraska, 2005 medicaid reform ne, 2006 medicaid ne, 2009 unicameral session, 2010 sovereignty resolution nebraska, 2010 sovereignty resolutions, 2012 legislature nebraska medicaid expansion, 2012 unicameral medicaid, abortion versus illegal immigration, acceptance of federal funds and state sovereignty, catholic legislative lobbying, catholics promoting government welfare, chief justice john roberts, chip program nebraska, cradle to grave dependency, dave heineman, encouraging illegal immigration, encouraging irresponsibility, entitlement spending, entitlement spending nebraska, exploding cost of welfare, federal government medicaid requirements, federal poverty guidelines in health care law, gin letter to senators re: lb599, governor heineman veto, grassroots in nebraska letter to senators medicaid expansion, grassroots in nebraska letter to state senators lb599, health care law maintenance of effort requirement, health care reform law, heineman veto, history of medicaid nebraska, illegal immigrants, increasing eligibility for medicaid, john roberts state sovereignty, justice roberts comments medicaid and sovereignty, kathy campbell, lb1110, lb1248, lb599, lb709, legislative history lb599, legislative journal lb599, low-income women, lr292 sovereignty resolution, lr539 nebraska, maintenance of effort, mandates on states medicaid health care law, medicaid abortion, medicaid coercion, medicaid coercion in health care law, medicaid managed care, medicaid program, medicaid reform nebraska, ne lr292, ne medicaid expansion, ne medicaid spending, nebraska arra funds, nebraska budget, nebraska expanding medicaid, nebraska medicaid bailout, nebraska medicaid benefits, nebraska medicaid reform legislation, nebraska progressives, nebraska special session budget, nebraska stimulus, nebraska stimulus accepted, nebraska unicameral, number of abortions in nebraska, obamacare, optional medicaid services nebraska, oral arguments supreme court, percentage of births paid for by medicaid in nebraska, personal responsibility, prenatal coverage abortion, preventing abortion, progressivism in nebraska, schips nebraska, social justice, state acceptance of stimulus funds, state senators sovereignty nebraska, state sovereignty resolution, state sovereignty resolution nebraska, stimulus medicaid bailout, subsidizing irresponsibility, use of stimulus funds, welfare expansion, welfare programs nebraska, welfare spending, welfare spending nebraska

US Supreme Court Health Care Arguments: The Basics

Originally published March 26, 2012, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated July 21, 2015. 2 Comments

US Supreme Court Health Care Arguments: The Basics

UPDATES noted in red: Last update, Sunday, April 1 @2:46pm The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on health care “reform” cases in three sessions on three days this week, beginning today, Monday, March 26. The Supreme Court’s ruling on the case, widely expected in June of this year, is of obvious historic importance, […]

Filed Under: Charity vs Welfare, Constitution, Featured, Federal Legislation, Health Care, In the News, Legal Limit, Personal Responsibility, State Sovereignty Tagged With: anti-injunction act, anti-injunction act of 1867, appeals courts, attorneys general lawsuits, commerce clause, department of health and human services, florida v. dept. of health & human services, florida v. h.h.s., h.h.s v. florida, health care cases, health care constitutional, health care lawsuits, health care lawsuits audio, health care penalty, health care severability clause, health care tax, health care tax penalty, health care unconstitutional, healthcare constitution, healthcare lawsuits, healthcare legislation, healthcare unconstitutional, historic supreme court cases, how can I listen to the supreme court hearing?, individual mandate, landmark court cases, listen to u.s. supreme court, medicaid and health care law, medicaid coercion, medicaid program, medicaid voluntary, minimum coverage provisions, national federation of independent businesses, obamacare, oral argument schedules, oral arguments, oral arguments audio, patient protection and affordable care act, petitioner and respondent in health care cases, scotus, scotus audio, Sebelius, secretary of health and human services, severability, states lawsuits, supreme court, supreme court audio, supreme court oral arguments, supreme court rulings, tax anti-injunction act, u.s. court system, u.s. supreme court

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
  • Next Page »

Latest

Dream Small

Dream Small

In 2016, during a period of about a year when it seemed possible -- even likely … Read full article...

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Back by popular dem