Grassroots in Nebraska

Working towards Constitutional, limited government

  • Home
  • About
    • About GiN
    • Principles
    • Operating Philosophy
    • Policies
  • Elections
    • Election 2016
    • Election 2014
    • Election 2012
    • Election 2010
    • Local Elections
    • Sample Ballots
  • Local
    • City of Lincoln
    • Lancaster County
  • State
    • Your Representatives
    • Governor
    • NE Unicameral
  • Federal
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
    • Tip Submissions
You are here: Home / Archives for attorneys general

Ruling: State Lawsuit Against Illegal ObamaCare IRS Rule Can Proceed

Originally published September 12, 2013, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated July 21, 2015. 2 Comments

Ruling: State Lawsuit Against Illegal ObamaCare IRS Rule Can Proceed

On August 11, 2013, a federal judge ruled that the State of Oklahoma has standing to proceed with a lawsuit challenging an Internal Revenue Service rule issued in May 2012 regarding premium subsidies in the form of tax credits and penalties delivered through the Affordable Care Act’s insurance exchange provisions. Oklahoma’s Attorney General Scott Pruitt […]

Filed Under: Featured, Federal Legislation, Health Care, Legal Limit, State Sovereignty Tagged With: aca, attorney general, attorneys general, congress, defund, governor, governors, health care law, insurance exchanges, irs, jon bruning, jonathan adler, lawsuit, legislators, litigation, michael cannon, nfib v sebelius, obamacare, oklahoma, ppaca, state senators

Health Care Reform: Republicans Helping Implementation (For Our Own Good)

Originally published December 6, 2011, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated July 21, 2015. 3 Comments

Health Care Reform: Republicans Helping Implementation (For Our Own Good)

“The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse.” ~ James Madison, 1829 So, all quiet on the health care front? Definitely not. There were recent news reports about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to consolidate and hear several health care law […]

Filed Under: 2010 Election, Ben Nelson, Big Brother Government, Congress, Data Gathering, Featured, Federal, Federal Legislation, Governor, Health Care, Legal Limit, Like Drunken Sailors, Nebraska, Senators, State Legislation, State Sovereignty, Stimulus, US House, US Senate, Welfare Tagged With: 2010, 26 states, adrian smith, attorneys general, attorneys general lawsuit, commerce clause, congressional repeal of health care, constitutional, constitutionality, cornhusker kickback, cutting state budgets, dave heineman, de-fund, department of justice, doj, election issues, expanding medicaid programs, facts about health care law, february 2009 stimulus bill, federal court, federal government, florida, gop congress repeal, governor, governors, Health Care, health care court cases, health care implemenation, health care law, health care lawsuit, health care opposition, health care reform, health care setup, health care stimulus provisions, health care unconstitutional, healthcare, healthcare law, healthcare reform, house repeal health care, implementation of health care law, individual mandate, insurance exchanges, interposition, jeff fortenberry, jeremy nordquist, judge roger vinson, justice department, lee terry, local focus, march 21 2010, march 3 ruling, medicaid, medicaid expansion, medicaid program, motion to clarify, nanny state, ne unicameral, nebraska, nebraska gop, nebraska governor, nebraska health care, nebraska tea party, nebraska teaparty, nebraska unicameral, northern district, obama care, obamacare, opposition to health care law implementation, opt-out clause in health care law, original meaning, paca, party politics, repeal, roger vinson, ruling in health care case, senator ben nelson, state budget cuts, state budgets, state government, state implementation of health care, state legislators, state legislatures, state officials, state senators, state sovereignty, states are implementing health care law, stay in health care case, stopping health care, stopping the health care law, supreme court, the nullification debate, truths about health care law, unfunded mandates, universal health care, untold truths about health care law, vinson, welfare programs, welfare state

History Has Proven Nullification a Failure – Just Look at REAL ID

Originally published March 14, 2011, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated May 26, 2013. 7 Comments

History Has Proven Nullification a Failure – Just Look at REAL ID

This is Part 2 in a continuing series on nullification. For Part 1, click HERE. In Part 1, I explained that in the past year, I’ve come to realize that nullification is not a solution that should be pursued by the states. That change of opinion, the result of much research and reflection, includes a […]

Filed Under: Biometrics, Legal Limit, REAL ID, State Sovereignty Tagged With: 2007 nebraska resolution real id, attorney general, attorneys general, balanced federalism, bill of rights, biometrics, chips in driver's licenses, driver's license, federalism, fifth amendment, fourth amendment, governor, governors, history of nullification, history of real id, interposition, jurisdiction, law enforcement, lr28 real id, national id card, nebraska governor, nebraska politics, nebraska real id, nullification, nullification by states, nullification debate, personal information, personal privacy, politics, printz vs united states, real id, state action on nullification, state legislatures, Unicameral

Health Care Lawsuits: Judge Stays Order, Gives Feds 7 Days to Appeal

Originally published March 9, 2011, By Linda. Updated May 8, 2012. Leave a Comment

dis·in·gen·u·ous Adjective /ˌdisinˈjenyo͞oəs Synonyms: adjective: insincere, false, devious, hollow-hearted Not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does This definition of the word “disingenuous” should be accompanied by a direct link to the Motion to Clarify the U.S. Justice Department recently sought from Judge Vinson in the […]

Filed Under: Featured, Health Care, Legal Limit Tagged With: 26 states, attorneys general, attorneys general lawsuit, commerce clause, department of justice, doj, federal court, federal government, florida, Health Care, health care court cases, health care lawsuit, health care reform, health care unconstitutional, healthcare, individual mandate, judge roger vinson, justice department, march 3 ruling, motion to clarify, nebraska health care, northern district, obamacare, roger vinson, ruling in health care case, stay in health care case, supreme court, vinson

Implementing Health Care Law: Good For NE Or Nordquist?

Originally published October 23, 2010, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated September 8, 2014. 3 Comments

Implementing Health Care Law: Good For NE Or Nordquist?

By Shelli Dawdy PENDING ACTION PLANNED: We request that GiN site visitors share this article with other Nebraskans who are opposed to the imposition of the health care law in our state. We are requesting all Nebraskans who believe the health care law is unconstitutional, a disaster for the economy, a threat to the overall […]

Filed Under: Featured, Smoking Section, State Sovereignty, Unicameral Tagged With: action, attorney general lawsuits, attorneys general, Ben Nelson, blue cross blue sheild, cato institute, chairman of health care committee, conflicts of interest, congress, court, democrats, federal dollars, fighting health care, gangster government, health care clinics in schools, health care priorities, heineman, hhs, implementing the health care law, increasing costs, individual mandate, insurance companies, insurers, jeremy nordquist, kaiser foundation, Kathleen Sebelius, lb 1110, lb 601, lb 603, lincoln journal star, mcdonald's, media covrage, medicaid, millman study, national conference of state legislators, ncsl, ne unicameral, nebraska tea party, nordquist, nullification, nullify, omaha world herald, one world clinic, polls nebraskans, prenatal care, printz v united states, programs, public input, rasmussen reports, repeal health care, republican majority, republicans, senator nordquist, state sovereignty, study, supreme court, survery on health care, taking action, tea parties, Tea Party, teaparties, Tenth Amendment, third party providers, threatenting letter, unfunded mandates, united health care, waivers, website

Latest

Dream Small

Dream Small

In 2016, during a period of about a year when it seemed possible -- even likely … Read full article...

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Back by popular dem