Grassroots in Nebraska

Working towards Constitutional, limited government

  • Home
  • About
    • About GiN
    • Principles
    • Operating Philosophy
    • Policies
  • Elections
    • Election 2016
    • Election 2014
    • Election 2012
    • Election 2010
    • Local Elections
    • Sample Ballots
  • Local
    • City of Lincoln
    • Lancaster County
  • State
    • Your Representatives
    • Governor
    • NE Unicameral
  • Federal
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
    • Tip Submissions
You are here: Home / Archives for governors

Ruling: State Lawsuit Against Illegal ObamaCare IRS Rule Can Proceed

Originally published September 12, 2013, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated July 21, 2015. 2 Comments

Ruling: State Lawsuit Against Illegal ObamaCare IRS Rule Can Proceed

On August 11, 2013, a federal judge ruled that the State of Oklahoma has standing to proceed with a lawsuit challenging an Internal Revenue Service rule issued in May 2012 regarding premium subsidies in the form of tax credits and penalties delivered through the Affordable Care Act’s insurance exchange provisions. Oklahoma’s Attorney General Scott Pruitt […]

Filed Under: Featured, Federal Legislation, Health Care, Legal Limit, State Sovereignty Tagged With: aca, attorney general, attorneys general, congress, defund, governor, governors, health care law, insurance exchanges, irs, jon bruning, jonathan adler, lawsuit, legislators, litigation, michael cannon, nfib v sebelius, obamacare, oklahoma, ppaca, state senators

Health Care Reform: Republicans Helping Implementation (For Our Own Good)

Originally published December 6, 2011, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated July 21, 2015. 3 Comments

Health Care Reform: Republicans Helping Implementation (For Our Own Good)

“The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse.” ~ James Madison, 1829 So, all quiet on the health care front? Definitely not. There were recent news reports about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to consolidate and hear several health care law […]

Filed Under: 2010 Election, Ben Nelson, Big Brother Government, Congress, Data Gathering, Featured, Federal, Federal Legislation, Governor, Health Care, Legal Limit, Like Drunken Sailors, Nebraska, Senators, State Legislation, State Sovereignty, Stimulus, US House, US Senate, Welfare Tagged With: 2010, 26 states, adrian smith, attorneys general, attorneys general lawsuit, commerce clause, congressional repeal of health care, constitutional, constitutionality, cornhusker kickback, cutting state budgets, dave heineman, de-fund, department of justice, doj, election issues, expanding medicaid programs, facts about health care law, february 2009 stimulus bill, federal court, federal government, florida, gop congress repeal, governor, governors, Health Care, health care court cases, health care implemenation, health care law, health care lawsuit, health care opposition, health care reform, health care setup, health care stimulus provisions, health care unconstitutional, healthcare, healthcare law, healthcare reform, house repeal health care, implementation of health care law, individual mandate, insurance exchanges, interposition, jeff fortenberry, jeremy nordquist, judge roger vinson, justice department, lee terry, local focus, march 21 2010, march 3 ruling, medicaid, medicaid expansion, medicaid program, motion to clarify, nanny state, ne unicameral, nebraska, nebraska gop, nebraska governor, nebraska health care, nebraska tea party, nebraska teaparty, nebraska unicameral, northern district, obama care, obamacare, opposition to health care law implementation, opt-out clause in health care law, original meaning, paca, party politics, repeal, roger vinson, ruling in health care case, senator ben nelson, state budget cuts, state budgets, state government, state implementation of health care, state legislators, state legislatures, state officials, state senators, state sovereignty, states are implementing health care law, stay in health care case, stopping health care, stopping the health care law, supreme court, the nullification debate, truths about health care law, unfunded mandates, universal health care, untold truths about health care law, vinson, welfare programs, welfare state

US Governors Led By Dave Heineman to Pair Up With Chinese July 15

Originally published July 1, 2011, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated July 6, 2011. 2 Comments

US Governors Led By Dave Heineman to Pair Up With Chinese July 15

  Nebraskans concerned about U.S. sovereignty and the health of our economy, may want to get in touch with Dave Heineman regarding the upcoming forum explained forum. See the bottom of this article for Governor Heineman’s contact information. Several weeks ago, our friends at OK-SAFE alerted us to the fact that the National Governors Association […]

Filed Under: Constitution, Featured, Foreign Policy, Governor, Nebraska, Sovereignty Tagged With: affecting public policy, balanced federalism, china, china hacking u.s. government computers, chinese, chinese hacking, circumventing the constitution, clinton memorandum of understanding with the chinese, commerce clause, communism, congressional powers, Constitution, cozying up to communists, dual sovereignty, enumerated powers of congress, executive branch, foreign policy, globalism, google hacking by china, governor dave heineman, governors, governors forum, hillary clinton, legislative branch, legitimate federal authority, limited government, memorandums of understanding, national governors association, ne, ne governor, nebraska, nga, nga chair, nga chair dave heineman, nga salt lake city, printz v united states, prohibitions on state governments, ratification of treaties, regulation of trade, secretary clinton, secretary of state, separation of powers, seperation of powers doctrine, sovereignty, trade deficits, trade imbalances, treaty, u.n., u.s., u.s. sovereignty, u.s. supreme court, unconstitutional actions by secretary of state, unconstitutional actions by states, unelected bodies, unfair trade practices, united nations, united states, unofficial entities, violations of u.s. constitution

Nullification: Are States Sitting Ducks or Willing Accomplices?

Originally published March 24, 2011, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated May 26, 2013. 3 Comments

Nullification: Are States Sitting Ducks or Willing Accomplices?

This article is part of an ongoing series about the concept of nullification by states; the idea that individual states can declare a federal law or regulation unconstitutional, and therefore, refuse to implement it. See the bottom of this article for a complete list of series’ articles. This article explores the second reason why I […]

Filed Under: Governor, Health Care, Nebraska, Senators, State Sovereignty, Tenth Amendment, Unicameral Tagged With: 10th Amendment, antonin scalia, attorneys general lawsuits, balanced federalism, bureaucracy, bureaucrats, commerce clause, Constitution, dual federalism, dual sovereignty, effectiveness of nullification, federal aid to states, federal debt, federal deficit, federal funding, florida court, general welfare clause, governor, governors, gregory v ashcroft, growth of government, health care implementation, health care law, healthcare law, interposition, judge roger vinson, justice scalia, legislators, lopez v united states, myths about nullification, necessary and proper clause, northern district, nullification, nullification series, obamacare, printz v united states, state governments, state senators, state sovereignty, states, stopping obamacare, supreme court, supreme court rulings, supreme court state sovereignty, Tenth Amendment, the nullification debate, the states, unconstitutional, us constitution

History Has Proven Nullification a Failure – Just Look at REAL ID

Originally published March 14, 2011, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated May 26, 2013. 7 Comments

History Has Proven Nullification a Failure – Just Look at REAL ID

This is Part 2 in a continuing series on nullification. For Part 1, click HERE. In Part 1, I explained that in the past year, I’ve come to realize that nullification is not a solution that should be pursued by the states. That change of opinion, the result of much research and reflection, includes a […]

Filed Under: Biometrics, Legal Limit, REAL ID, State Sovereignty Tagged With: 2007 nebraska resolution real id, attorney general, attorneys general, balanced federalism, bill of rights, biometrics, chips in driver's licenses, driver's license, federalism, fifth amendment, fourth amendment, governor, governors, history of nullification, history of real id, interposition, jurisdiction, law enforcement, lr28 real id, national id card, nebraska governor, nebraska politics, nebraska real id, nullification, nullification by states, nullification debate, personal information, personal privacy, politics, printz vs united states, real id, state action on nullification, state legislatures, Unicameral

Nullification NOT the Answer for Health Care (or anything else)

Originally published March 13, 2011, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated May 26, 2013. 3 Comments

Nullification NOT the Answer for Health Care (or anything else)

This is the first installment in a series about nullification – see the bottom of this article for a complete list. On March 21, 2010 – I stood on an improvised stage (the back of a pickup truck) located between the State Capitol and the Governor’s mansion at GiN’s flash rally “Kill or Nullify the […]

Filed Under: Events, Featured, Health Care, State Legislation, State Sovereignty, Tenth Amendment Tagged With: 10th Amendment, constitutional, constitutionality, cornhusker kickback, dave heineman, de-fund, federal government, federal tyranny, gin rallies, governor, governors, grassroots action, grassroots activists, Grassroots in Nebraska, Health Care, health care implemenation, health care law, health care opposition, healthcare, interposition, kill or nullify the bill, local focus, march 21 2010, medicaid, nebraska tea party, nebraska teaparty, nebraska unicameral, nullifcation series, nullification, obamacare, opposition to health care law implementation, original meaning, repeal, republic v democracy, senator ben nelson, state budgets, state government, state officials, state senators, state sovereignty, tea party rallies, teaparty rallies, Tenth Amendment, tenth amendment center, the nullification debate, tyranny of federal government, unfunded mandates, virginia and kentucky resolutions

Federal Funding Tap Dance: Are States Puppets Or Partners?

Originally published August 24, 2010, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated August 24, 2010. Leave a Comment

Federal Funding Tap Dance: Are States Puppets Or Partners?

This article is part of a continuing series. If you’d like to read any of the others, just click on one of the titles below: Don’t Count On A Republican Congress To Save The Day GOP Congress Will Not Save Us – Time To Choose OURSELVES Federal Red Ink Tsunami: The Life Boats Are Within […]

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: 10th Amendment, 9th amendment, antonin scalia, august recess, barbour, brady bill, cap and trade, City of Lincoln, cornhusker kickback, dave heineman, Facts are Stubborn Things, Featured, federal encroachment, federal funding, federal grants, federal mandates, federal programs, federal red ink tsunami, feds, fred astaire, free enterprise, gatoraid, gin, ginger rogers, government entitlement programs, government workers unions, governor, governor heineman, governors, Grassroots in Nebraska, grassrootsne, Health Care, healthcare, heineman, i’m in heaven, i’m your puppet, jobs bill, limited government, lincoln police department, mississippi, Nancy Pelosi, ne, nebraska, nebraska department of health and human services, negrassroots, new york vs us, ninth amendment, no child left behind, nullification, nullify, printz v united states, puppet masters, Richard Mack, second louisiana purchase, state aid to education, state governors, state legislators, state life boats, states puppets, States Shelli Dawdy, stimulus bills, stimulus pushers, stubborn facts, supreme court, supreme court cases, teachers unions, Tenth Amendment, top hat, unfunded mandates, Unicameral, union payoff

Federal Red Ink Tsunami: The Life Boats Are Within Our Reach

Originally published August 19, 2010, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated March 9, 2012. Leave a Comment

Federal Red Ink Tsunami: The Life Boats Are Within Our Reach

By Shelli Dawdy In two recent articles, I laid out what I believe to be some unfortunate truths. In Don’t Count On A Republican Congress To Save The Day I theorized there is ample evidence and information that placing all hopes on the results of November’s election is a fallacy. The title of the second, […]

Filed Under: Deficit, Featured, Government Spending, Like Drunken Sailors, Taxes Tagged With: 10th Amendment, 9th amendment, ballot initiative, cartoon, entitlement programs, exercise of state sovereignty, Facts are Stubborn Things, Featured, federal deficit, federal government, federal spending, free enterprise, gin, government spending, governors, Grassroots in Nebraska, gulf coast oil spill, immigration, legislators, limited government, missouri nullifies healthcare law, missouri prop c, missouri voters, nebraska, ninth amendment, nullification, nullifying effect, overspending by government, Principles & Philosophy, printz vs the united states, red ink spill, red ink tsunami, ruling class, shelli dawdy, solution to our problem, state action against federal government, state legislatures, state representatives, state sovereignty, stop the insanity, stubborn facts, Tenth Amendment, tenth with teeth

Latest

Dream Small

Dream Small

In 2016, during a period of about a year when it seemed possible -- even likely … Read full article...

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Back by popular dem