Grassroots in Nebraska

Working towards Constitutional, limited government

  • Home
  • About
    • About GiN
    • Principles
    • Operating Philosophy
    • Policies
  • Elections
    • Election 2016
    • Election 2014
    • Election 2012
    • Election 2010
    • Local Elections
    • Sample Ballots
  • Local
    • City of Lincoln
    • Lancaster County
  • State
    • Your Representatives
    • Governor
    • NE Unicameral
  • Federal
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
    • Tip Submissions
You are here: Home / Archives for judicial over reach

Whether You THINK About Health Insurance or NOT – Judge Says Government Can Regulate That

Originally published March 2, 2011, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated June 30, 2013. Leave a Comment

Whether You THINK About Health Insurance or NOT – Judge Says Government Can Regulate That

Remember Ripley’s Believe it or Not? Maybe the Ripley’s folks should present this information, because it’s about as strange as some of the things I remember seeing on the TV show I watched when I was a teen. We’ve been writing about rulings on cases challenging the health care law, and most recently, we’ve put […]

Filed Under: Health Care, Legal Limit Tagged With: activist judges, big brother, commerce, commerce clause, commercial activity, constitutional, court rulings, district court, federal, government power, health care law, health care lawsuits, healthcare, implementation, individual mandate, judge gladys kessler, judicial over reach, lawsuits, mental activity, obamacare, regulation, reversible error, role of federal government, thought police, unconstitutional

Unconstitutional: Who Decides? States via Nullification or Supreme Court?

Originally published December 7, 2010, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated February 3, 2013. 4 Comments

Unconstitutional: Who Decides? States via Nullification or Supreme Court?

“Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding, and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties, which may make anything mean nothing or everything, at pleasure.” Many people are seeking solutions to rein in the growth of government, most particularly […]

Filed Under: Constitution, Featured, Founding Fathers, Founding Principles, History Tagged With: 10th Amendment, 17th amendment, adams midnight appointements, alexander hamilton, american history court rulings, american history supreme court, american union, arbiter of constitutional questions, article v constitution, balance of powers, balanced federalism, chief justice marshall, cohens, Constitution, constitutional amendements, constitutional convention, constitutionality, federal government, federal over-reach, federalists, growth of government, history of the supreme court, interposition, james madison, jefferson letters, jefferson original writings, jefferson to johnson, judge johnson, judge made law, judicial branch, judicial over reach, judicial power, judicial powers us government, justice marshall marbury v madison, living constitution, marbury v madison, marshall, nullification, nullification book, original republicans, president jefferson, repeal, republic vs democracy, republicans, role of state governments, role of states, secretary of state madison, separation of powers, state nullification, state sovereignty, states, supreme court, Tenth Amendment, thomas jefferson, thomas jefferson letters, thomas woods, true federalism, us constitution, us constitution amendment process, us supreme court decisions, us supreme court rulings

Latest

Dream Small

Dream Small

In 2016, during a period of about a year when it seemed possible -- even likely … Read full article...

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Back by popular dem