Grassroots in Nebraska

Working towards Constitutional, limited government

  • Home
  • About
    • About GiN
    • Principles
    • Operating Philosophy
    • Policies
  • Elections
    • Election 2016
    • Election 2014
    • Election 2012
    • Election 2010
    • Local Elections
    • Sample Ballots
  • Local
    • City of Lincoln
    • Lancaster County
  • State
    • Your Representatives
    • Governor
    • NE Unicameral
  • Federal
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
    • Tip Submissions
You are here: Home / Archives for printz v united states

US Governors Led By Dave Heineman to Pair Up With Chinese July 15

Originally published July 1, 2011, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated July 6, 2011. 2 Comments

US Governors Led By Dave Heineman to Pair Up With Chinese July 15

  Nebraskans concerned about U.S. sovereignty and the health of our economy, may want to get in touch with Dave Heineman regarding the upcoming forum explained forum. See the bottom of this article for Governor Heineman’s contact information. Several weeks ago, our friends at OK-SAFE alerted us to the fact that the National Governors Association […]

Filed Under: Constitution, Featured, Foreign Policy, Governor, Nebraska, Sovereignty Tagged With: affecting public policy, balanced federalism, china, china hacking u.s. government computers, chinese, chinese hacking, circumventing the constitution, clinton memorandum of understanding with the chinese, commerce clause, communism, congressional powers, Constitution, cozying up to communists, dual sovereignty, enumerated powers of congress, executive branch, foreign policy, globalism, google hacking by china, governor dave heineman, governors, governors forum, hillary clinton, legislative branch, legitimate federal authority, limited government, memorandums of understanding, national governors association, ne, ne governor, nebraska, nga, nga chair, nga chair dave heineman, nga salt lake city, printz v united states, prohibitions on state governments, ratification of treaties, regulation of trade, secretary clinton, secretary of state, separation of powers, seperation of powers doctrine, sovereignty, trade deficits, trade imbalances, treaty, u.n., u.s., u.s. sovereignty, u.s. supreme court, unconstitutional actions by secretary of state, unconstitutional actions by states, unelected bodies, unfair trade practices, united nations, united states, unofficial entities, violations of u.s. constitution

Nullification: Are States Sitting Ducks or Willing Accomplices?

Originally published March 24, 2011, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated May 26, 2013. 3 Comments

Nullification: Are States Sitting Ducks or Willing Accomplices?

This article is part of an ongoing series about the concept of nullification by states; the idea that individual states can declare a federal law or regulation unconstitutional, and therefore, refuse to implement it. See the bottom of this article for a complete list of series’ articles. This article explores the second reason why I […]

Filed Under: Governor, Health Care, Nebraska, Senators, State Sovereignty, Tenth Amendment, Unicameral Tagged With: 10th Amendment, antonin scalia, attorneys general lawsuits, balanced federalism, bureaucracy, bureaucrats, commerce clause, Constitution, dual federalism, dual sovereignty, effectiveness of nullification, federal aid to states, federal debt, federal deficit, federal funding, florida court, general welfare clause, governor, governors, gregory v ashcroft, growth of government, health care implementation, health care law, healthcare law, interposition, judge roger vinson, justice scalia, legislators, lopez v united states, myths about nullification, necessary and proper clause, northern district, nullification, nullification series, obamacare, printz v united states, state governments, state senators, state sovereignty, states, stopping obamacare, supreme court, supreme court rulings, supreme court state sovereignty, Tenth Amendment, the nullification debate, the states, unconstitutional, us constitution

Implementing Health Care Law: Good For NE Or Nordquist?

Originally published October 23, 2010, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated September 8, 2014. 3 Comments

Implementing Health Care Law: Good For NE Or Nordquist?

By Shelli Dawdy PENDING ACTION PLANNED: We request that GiN site visitors share this article with other Nebraskans who are opposed to the imposition of the health care law in our state. We are requesting all Nebraskans who believe the health care law is unconstitutional, a disaster for the economy, a threat to the overall […]

Filed Under: Featured, Smoking Section, State Sovereignty, Unicameral Tagged With: action, attorney general lawsuits, attorneys general, Ben Nelson, blue cross blue sheild, cato institute, chairman of health care committee, conflicts of interest, congress, court, democrats, federal dollars, fighting health care, gangster government, health care clinics in schools, health care priorities, heineman, hhs, implementing the health care law, increasing costs, individual mandate, insurance companies, insurers, jeremy nordquist, kaiser foundation, Kathleen Sebelius, lb 1110, lb 601, lb 603, lincoln journal star, mcdonald's, media covrage, medicaid, millman study, national conference of state legislators, ncsl, ne unicameral, nebraska tea party, nordquist, nullification, nullify, omaha world herald, one world clinic, polls nebraskans, prenatal care, printz v united states, programs, public input, rasmussen reports, repeal health care, republican majority, republicans, senator nordquist, state sovereignty, study, supreme court, survery on health care, taking action, tea parties, Tea Party, teaparties, Tenth Amendment, third party providers, threatenting letter, unfunded mandates, united health care, waivers, website

Federal Funding Tap Dance: Are States Puppets Or Partners?

Originally published August 24, 2010, By Shelli Dawdy. Updated August 24, 2010. Leave a Comment

Federal Funding Tap Dance: Are States Puppets Or Partners?

This article is part of a continuing series. If you’d like to read any of the others, just click on one of the titles below: Don’t Count On A Republican Congress To Save The Day GOP Congress Will Not Save Us – Time To Choose OURSELVES Federal Red Ink Tsunami: The Life Boats Are Within […]

Filed Under: Featured Tagged With: 10th Amendment, 9th amendment, antonin scalia, august recess, barbour, brady bill, cap and trade, City of Lincoln, cornhusker kickback, dave heineman, Facts are Stubborn Things, Featured, federal encroachment, federal funding, federal grants, federal mandates, federal programs, federal red ink tsunami, feds, fred astaire, free enterprise, gatoraid, gin, ginger rogers, government entitlement programs, government workers unions, governor, governor heineman, governors, Grassroots in Nebraska, grassrootsne, Health Care, healthcare, heineman, i’m in heaven, i’m your puppet, jobs bill, limited government, lincoln police department, mississippi, Nancy Pelosi, ne, nebraska, nebraska department of health and human services, negrassroots, new york vs us, ninth amendment, no child left behind, nullification, nullify, printz v united states, puppet masters, Richard Mack, second louisiana purchase, state aid to education, state governors, state legislators, state life boats, states puppets, States Shelli Dawdy, stimulus bills, stimulus pushers, stubborn facts, supreme court, supreme court cases, teachers unions, Tenth Amendment, top hat, unfunded mandates, Unicameral, union payoff

Latest

Dream Small

Dream Small

In 2016, during a period of about a year when it seemed possible -- even likely … Read full article...

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Nebraska 2018 Primary Election Sample Ballots

Back by popular dem